Category: police


I wonder how many people spotted the ambiguity in the title. What the poster actually advertised was a “family fun day” run by the county police at their headquarters. Although some in our party did not really want to go out that day, in the end we all found something of interest and/or enjoyment from it. I would not give it 10 out of 10 (the helicopter did not show up – presumably having been called elsewhere) but I would go again another year.

I was not the only one taking photographs

It was not that the stalls were the latest in entertainment (they were not, but were interesting nonetheless) that made it a good day, but rather that you could mingle with and ask all sorts of questions of different kinds of police officer. For example, a fellow visitor had a fairly long and detailed conversation with an armed police officer about the use of tasers: how they worked, how they were deployed, how often they were used and the effect they had on the people who got caught at the wrong end of one. I did not get the sense of any information being held back.

The food was not the sort to write home about but the price was reasonable and the burger tasted OK – for most events of this sort that is actually high praise!

The day was open to the public so it was not possible to tell which families belonged to off-duty police officers and staff and which were from the wider community – by all accounts there was a mixture of both.

petrol bombing

We found the “public order training” interesting and here are a couple of photos from the petrol bomb training demonstration.

dealing with a petrol bomb

I appreciate the fact that I was looking at the event with sympathetic eyes and realise that not everyone’s experience of their local police is particularly positive. However, here at least was an attempt to engage with the public in an open and non-threatening way – to  allow a passer-by or two into their territory. To do their job the police have to be set apart from the rest of society at least a little bit – hence the uniform. But the point is that they are a-side and not a-bove. When they get it right they realise not just that they serve the community but that they are also part of it. That is why I am reluctant to consider having solely a national police force: a county (or similar) police service needs to realise that it belongs to the community they work among.

Most of this post was drafted before the troubles and riots in Tottenham and elsewhere. Despite  any criticisms, what I observed at the open day still applies and I believe that the British police do manage to get it right a lot of the time.

Policy, police, politician. hoi polloi, metropolis (city) all derive from a word meaning people. In other words, policemen and women, as well as politicians and other policy-makers, need to remember that they are part of the people not apart from them. The trouble is that we tend to expect them all to be better than other people – at least to behave better than the rest of us. When some of them don’t live up to that expectation it comes as a bit of a shock – but it need not be a total surprise if we realise that people are, well, people. None of us are perfect, few of us never break any law (speeding ticket anyone?) and we should not be surprised that we find criminal behaviour in all parts of society.

But shouldn’t we expect high standards of behaviour from those who want to run the country and from those who want to influence them? Yes, of course we should. My point is that the pool of people from which these persons are drawn from is the same one that we all inhabit. If we want better police and politicians we need a better pool. In other words, everyone should strive for the highest standards of behaviour and integrity if we expect MPs, journalists, civil servants, the police etc, etc to do so too.

However, here’s the rub, even the most well-intentioned of us are not only imperfect in our attitudes and behaviour, we all find it difficult to live up even to our own standards let alone anyone else’s. So, while there is an enquiry into the terrible behaviour of some journalists, and questions about who is ‘fit and proper’ to be in charge of and own various parts of the press and media, I would like to suggest that there is a measure of humility amongst those who conduct it. Paul the apostle wrote: “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” – with the emphasis on the word “all”, I think. I am no fan of the newspapers and corporations who have come in for much criticism recently (and I believe well-founded criticism at that); but I think we will make little progress in our politics if we fall into a “holier than thou” attitude. Perhaps better to say, “There but for the grace of God, go I.”

%d bloggers like this: